I its also important to comprehend the difference between blame, responsibility, and culpability. One can take responsibility for a situation without being to blame for its problems. But the unpleasant fact of the matter, is that its the education of young people that make them what they are as adults. So I am unconcerned with typical individual states of mental disorder here, only with the problems that are systematically able to be corrected.

The 'education system' with which the world attempts to comprehend reality, is a global network whether we like it or not, because the world is a globe. So any attempt at isolation will bring the barbarians to your borders in waves of zombies like never before. The only way to resolve this is with improving the education processes of over-populating / poor countries.

It is important to realize the connected differences between the various education systems - to see why it is, for example, that some countries can produce VTOL aircraft carriers, and others can only produce corpses with which to fill a trench.

That we are even fighting such wars anyway is of course central to the issue; but it would be a tautology to argue against war with mere words. The nanny-state pacifists have by now hopefully stopped reading when I articulated the aircraft carrier as the sign of systematic success.

There are numerous reasons why it is that America has to be the one to bail out the rest of us from war after war after war. (I am African-British btw). There are also numerous reasons why Africa has managed to avoid the worst conflicts. And countless other reasons why it is that Britain has managed to survive so effectively with an ever dwindling spiral of success.

We also need to look at why Japan, Italy and Germany managed to so effectively snatch defeat from the jaws of victory when so many people thought them a sure-thing. And how this echoes the contemporary Russian situation too - which is surely just a hangover from world war 2 anyway.

At the crux of it all is the ontological fact of psychology, that technological power, is not in any way psychologically similar, to scientific advancement. The ideal reference here is Immanuel Kant. Analysis, is not at all synthesis.

My point being, that in so many ways, these two mindsets are paradoxically counter-productive to one another. Technology is NOT science. Only in the mind of the zombie apocalypse is technology equatable with science.

But we also need to see how money perpetuates false realities via the greatest tool of fascism ever devised: mass media. Even as money also magnifies any ideology with ever-greater power, so industry focuses that mind-state ever more accurately. But to what ends is that focus?

The inevitable consequence is an ever-growing population of ever more skilled individuals, with ever less to do, which then become increasingly redundant to the system that sustains them, and then it just lets them loose like they are someone else's problem.

Masculine frustration then inevitably results in an ever growing criminality; which in many situations gets channeled into a military mindset; which ends up invading whoever is convenient; under whatever pretexts are easiest to perpetuate as propaganda. The victim is now to 'blame', as they imply in mob culture. But the victim needs to take responsibility, rather than perpetuate a blame game.

If you think that only some blokes are prone to war-mongering, then you are certainly living behind a whitewash of dwindling privilege. And surely if all the males vanished in a feminist utopia, there would evolve a butch class with this identical problem.

So why do some males resort to forming an industrial-scale mass-formation nationalist-fascist pathology? And why has this been less of a problem in the places mentioned: America, Africa, and to some extent Britain and France?

It is utterly vital to see how circumstances in Japan deteriorated after their successes at the start of the 1900's, with Russia being the fall-guy. Such that the 1905 sinking of the Russian fleet by Japan did more to precipitate the fall of the Czars than anything else.

As the ideal nation to go from 3rd to 1st world without going through the banality of 2nd world communism, Japan was looking promising after world war 1. But that ideal disintegrated into tyranny despite the noble efforts of its democratically elected, but repeatedly collapsing parliament.

The Chinese sabotage of the Manchurian railway, not only exposed the unsustainable nature of mass producing Bushido, but it also thereby decimated Germany's financial plan to pay its ww1 debts which had been organized by Russia. The domino effect of that Chinese Luddite attack, resulting in the great depression.

So Imperial Japan with its world war 2 technology, but antiquated psychology, exemplifies the problem with Russia currently. The same problem was with Weimar and its mini-me descendent, apartheid south africa.

But what made south africa different, was that quintessential ingredient for which we search. That spark of liberty that gets used for creative solutions rather than random degeneration that conservative media portends to falsely portray as the aim of liberty. The conformist always looks for scapegoats, the authentic liberal mind, for innovative solutions.

But most of the rise of fascism, is realized by the culmination of the Franco-Prussian war of 1870/1 where the Prussian system managed to mass produce a modern thuggery which all but decimated the most powerful and proud nation on the planet for the last 1000 years.

Losing its monarch, had made France fatally weaker, but when Prussian Germany hammered on to Paris again in ww1, and then yet again fully ravished her in ww2, it seemed as though crude quantitative militantism had won; just as its oriental shadow on the other side of the world proved just how paper-thin the fascist charade really was.

Of course the fascists had hoped that America would simply join with them, and Britain would then have no option, but to capitulate.

But this is not the age of the technology. It is the age of science. And as I said earlier, those two, form a virtually mutually exclusive paradoxical dichotomy of state-mind that requires some elucidation.

War destroys our capacity to think clearly, even as it focuses our capacity to see clearly. I have proven that most of the elitists have been unable to see the wood for the trees, for the last 2500 years. This should be utterly clear when considering the A.N.G.E.L. Trumpet and the other elevation launch concepts for aircraft carriers too.

And not being able to see the wood for the trees is precisely what results in all these calamitous conflicts. How could Japan effectively use the modern marvel of the aircraft carrier in 1941, when so few even attempt this feat as I write this in 2025? And of those that do attempt it, most of them put the fucking ramp on backwards!

Only America, France and Japan comprehend flight. Though, how many others may never have needed an aircraft carrier, is a somewhat plausible excuse. The malaria mosquito doing as fine-a-job as any other aircraft to defend the African skies from foreign invaders. And that malaria mosquito has a radar cross-section, that is the envy of even the stealthiest jet fighter on the planet. And they are a bit cheaper to produce too.

But I digress with humor. Seriously, you see, its not too difficult to train the logical mind. its an entirely different matter to think outside the box enough to be able to see that its made out of wood, and not trees.

So conformity of thinking does enable technological advancement, because it forbids error in construction.

But trial and error is always the most essential ingredient in innovation.

And perfecting the imagination comes from being comfortable with error as a natural part of the authentic creative learning process. And that requires liberty - the very antagonist of conformity.

There is a world of difference between pulling a trigger, and designing a gun. Just as writing music and performing music are utterly different faculties of mind.

Its actually a disaster to teach people technology without the innovative thinking required to keep that technology in a sustainable state of advancement. That is why we ended of with (c)rap music!

Acquiring a culture of innovation is something that cannot be taught. But it can be hindered and stifled by antiquated ideals. And most of such attitudes, for better or worse, are acquired in those formative education years.

The education system of the Prussians inundated the world with an intoxicating power. And Napoleon was himself the fore-runner of much of this trend prior to the rise of the Prussians; who just out-did Napoleon at his own game. But the Prussians lacked all creativity; pure hive-mind shadow-retaliation. Using as weapons, the fiery fruits of that very innovation that had scalded them for the previous 1000 years.

So Prussia morphed into a soulless bed of poppies, irrigated by the blood of a battlefield, stained with all the painkilling power of these monstrous industrial-scale opiates. And, after its senses were dulled by that success, it arose once more as the steel Leviathan of Germany.

When the mindless gray uniforms of socialism possessed the rotting corpse of France, so the once glamorous Franks dwindled from a thousand year kingdom, into a schizophrenic mental ward patient. Constantly being admitted for spousal abuse from her karma, that still has not seen suture in 200 years of social obliteration. But she will survive because her poetry never stops.

Still, America must look across the pond, bewildered at how europe seems destined to repeat the entire world war charade once more. Is it now Russia's turn to finally also have its way with that French whore? Does the ghost of Josephine beckon to the Red Army with ever more pretence and coquetry? Karma says so.

And yet America, for all its own success, does not actually seem to know why it has succeeded. If it did, it would be able to prescribe that recipe. But they cannot see the recipe, for the paper on which it is written is made of the wood that is hidden behind all those dammed trees again.

Just as the A.N.G.E.L. Trumpet is a laughably simple solution to rocket propulsion - so the solution to Europe and Russia's problem is quite simple too.

Stop being so prescriptive, and allow people to make mistakes. Get rid of uniform thinking. Especially get rid of that Prussian / Napoleonic school uniform completely. That is where innovation begins; with your own personality as you are growing up.

If you cannot be trusted with your own appearance, then how can you be trusted with any weapon of war?

Anyone who enforces any type of appearance, uniform or haircut on a child, is guilty of grooming children for war-mongering whether they like it or not, or whether they know it or not.

Uniform school mentality is no different to enforcing a medical process, because the mind is fundamentally connected to how we express ourselves. And innovative solutions stem from a life of a variety of choices, whereas conformity solves problems by hunting scapegoats, because they are simply different in mere outward appearance.

It would be better, to be rid of all high-school entirely, and replace them with internet cafe's.

As for the A.N.G.E.L. Trumpet, its not rocket science, hey, its natural philosophy.

You should all feel like fools after looking at the design for the A.N.G.E.L. Trumpet. Even I who designed her, feel like a fool because I should have seen her when in high school already.

Everything about the A.N.G.E.L. Trumpet was available to the ancient Greeks. Even Jesus did not figure it out, and he had those same tools handy, too.

But Stephen Marley knows my 500 reasons for being a fool:

"With the whip on your mind and your mind leads your soul astray".

What are your excuses?